BCS PDP9 Exam Dumps [2024] Practice Valid Exam Dumps Question
PDP9 Dumps - Grab Out For [NEW-2024] BCS Exam
BCS PDP9 Exam is an essential certification for professionals involved in data protection. It covers various areas of data protection, including data privacy laws and regulations, data breaches, data security, and the principles of data protection. It is a comprehensive exam that requires candidates to have a deep understanding of the subject matter. Passing the BCS PDP9 Exam demonstrates an individual's ability to manage data protection risks effectively and is an internationally recognized certification.
NEW QUESTION # 11
A company has twenty retail outlets in France and thirty retail outlets in Belgium The payroll department and the Data Protection Officer are based in Poland.The Company Board and administrative functions are based in Germany. Determine where the company's 'mainestablishment' would be
- A. Poland
- B. France
- C. Belgium
- D. Germany
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
The main establishment of a controller or a processor in the EU is the place where the decisions on the purposes and means of the processing of personal data are taken and implemented. According to Recital 36 of the GDPR, the main establishment of a controller with establishments in more than one Member State should be the place of its central administration in the EU, unless the decisions on the processing are taken in another establishment of the controller in the EU and the latter establishment has the power to have such decisions implemented, in which case the establishment havingtaken such decisions should be considered to be the main establishment. Similarly, the main establishment of a processor with establishments in more than one Member State should be the place of its central administration in the EU, or, if the processor has no central administration in the EU, the establishment of the processor in the EU where the main processing activities take place to the extent that the processor is subject to specific obligations under the GDPR. The main establishment is relevant for determining the lead supervisory authority, the applicable law, and the jurisdiction of the courts for cross-border processing of personal data. In this case, the company's main establishment would be Germany, as it is the place where the company board and administrative functions are based and where the decisions on the processing of personal data are likely to be taken and implemented.
References:
* Recital 36 of the GDPR8
* Article 4(16) of the GDPR9
* Article 56 of the GDPR
NEW QUESTION # 12
In the terms of their relevance under data protection legislation, how can CCTV images recorded in a supermarket BEST be described'?
- A. They are personal data as they can be used to identify living human beings
- B. They are special category data as they identify special characteristics
- C. The GDPR is only engaged where these are accompanied by text or other identifier
- D. They are biometric data in the terms of the definition stipulated in the GDPR.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
CCTV images recorded in a supermarket are personal data as they can be used to identify living human beings, either directly or indirectly, by their physical appearance, clothing, accessories, or other distinctive features.
Personal data is defined in Article 4(1) of the GDPR as "any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person". The GDPR applies to the processing of personal data by automated means, such as CCTV cameras, or by non-automated means that form part of a filing system, such as paper records. The other options are incorrect because:
* CCTV images are not special category data as they do not reveal any of the sensitive information listed in Article 9(1) of the GDPR, such as racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership, health, sex life or sexual orientation, or biometric or genetic data.
Special category data is subject to stricter conditions and safeguards under the GDPR, as it poses a higher risk to the rights and freedoms of individuals.
* CCTV images are not biometric data in the terms of the definition stipulated in the GDPR. Biometric data is defined in Article 4(14) of the GDPR as "personal data resulting from specific technical processing relating to the physical, physiological or behavioural characteristics of a natural person, which allow or confirm the unique identification of that natural person, such as facial images or dactyloscopic data". CCTV images do not result from specific technical processing, nor do they allow or confirm the unique identification of a natural person, unless they are combined with other data or identifiers.
* The GDPR is not only engaged where CCTV images are accompanied by text or other identifier. The GDPR applies to any information that relates to an identified or identifiable natural person, regardless of whether it is accompanied by text or other identifier. CCTV images can relate to an identifiable natural person even if they do not contain any text or other identifier, as long as there is a possibility to single out or link the person to other data or factors. References:
* GDPR, Article 4(1)1
* GDPR, Article 2(1)2
* GDPR, Article 9(1)3
* GDPR, Article 4(14)4
NEW QUESTION # 13
In which of the following circumstances does a public authority NOT need to appoint a Data Protection Officer?
- A. Where it is defined as a public body in the Data Protection Act 2018
- B. Where it processes a large amount of personal data
- C. Where it is a court acting in its judicial capacity
- D. Where it processes special category data
Answer: C
Explanation:
Explanation
Under Article 37 of the UK GDPR, a public authority or a public body must appoint a data protection officer (DPO) unless it is a court acting in its judicial capacity. This is the only exception for public authorities or bodies from the obligation to appoint a DPO. The other circumstances listed in the question, such as processing a large amount of personal data, processing special category data, or being defined as a public body in the Data Protection Act 2018, do not exempt a public authority or a public body from appointing a DPO.
References:
* Article 37 of the UK GDPR2
* Data protection officers | ICO2
NEW QUESTION # 14
Where a processor engages another processor ("sub-processor") to carry out processing activities on behalf of a controller, which of the following statements is CORRECT?
- A. The processor may use the sub-processor without the written authorisation of the controller if it adheres to an approved code of conduct
- B. The processor may use the sub-processor without the written authorisation of the controller if the processing is deemed to be low risk.
- C. The processor may use the sub-processor without the written authorisation of the controller if the sub-processor signs a contract which reflects the same obligations as the contract with the controller
- D. The processor must receive prior written authorisation to use the sub-processor
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
Article 28(2) of UK GDPR states that where a processor engages another processor ("sub-processor") for carrying out specific processing activities on behalf of the controller, the same data protection obligations as set out in the contract or other legal act between the controller and the processor shall be imposed on that other processor by way of a contract or other legal act under domestic law, in particular providing sufficient guarantees to implement appropriate technical and organisational measures in such a manner that the processing will meet the requirements of UK GDPR. The processor shall not engage another processor without prior specific or general written authorisation of the controller. In the case of general written authorisation, theprocessor shall inform the controller of any intended changes concerning the addition or replacement of other processors, thereby giving the controller the opportunity to object to such changes. The other options are incorrect, as they do not reflect the requirements of UK GDPR for using a sub-processor. The processor cannot use a sub-processor without the written authorisation of the controller, regardless of whether it adheres to an approved code of conduct, signs a contract with the same obligations as the controller, or deems the processing to be low risk. References:
* Article 28(2) of UK GDPR1
* ICO guidance on contracts and liabilities between controllers and processors3
NEW QUESTION # 15
Which one task are supervisory authorities NOT required to carry out under Article 57(1 )(f) of the UK GDPR? Select the CORRECT answer.
- A. Co-ordinate where necessary with other supervisory authorities
- B. Investigate complaints and inform the complainant of the progress of their investigation
- C. Handle complaints lodged by a data subject
- D. Mediate between the complainant and the entity against which the complaint has been lodged, to resolve the complaint
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
Article 57(1)(f) of the UK GDPR requires the supervisory authority (the ICO in the UK) to handle complaints lodged by a data subject, investigate the subject matter of the complaint, and inform the complainant of the progress and the outcome of the investigation. It also requires the supervisory authority to cooperate with other supervisory authorities if the complaint involves cross-border processing. However, it does not require the supervisory authority to mediate between the complainant and the controller or processor against which the complaint has been lodged, to resolve the complaint. This is not a task of the supervisory authority under the UK GDPR, although it may be possible in some cases as a way of achieving an amicable solution. References
:
* Article 57(1)(f) of the UK GDPR1
* ICO and complaints2
NEW QUESTION # 16
Which of the following is NOT a role of the Information Commissioner's Office?
- A. Providing case by case advice on what retention period companies should use
- B. Publishing a list of the kind of processing that is subject to the requirement for a DPIA
- C. Providing an annual activity report to Parliament
- D. Encouraging the establishment of data protection certification mechanisms and of data protection seals
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) is the UK's independent authority for data protection, which is responsible for upholding the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018, as well as other related legislation.
The ICO has various roles and tasks, such as monitoring and enforcing the application of the data protection law, promoting publicawareness and understanding of the risks and rights related to processing, advising the Parliament and the government on legislative and administrative measures concerning data protection, encouraging the development of codes of conduct and certification schemes, and handling complaints and investigations. However, the ICO does not provide case by case advice on what retention period companies should use, as this is a matter for the companies themselves to determine, based on their own purposes, legal obligations, and risk assessments. The ICO only provides general guidance on the data minimisation and storage limitation principles, which require that personal data should be kept only for as long as necessary and no longer than that. The ICO also expects companies to have clear policies and procedures on how they retain and dispose of personal data, and to document their retention periods and the reasons for them. References:
* Article 57 of the UK GDPR1
* ICO guidance on the role of the ICO2
* ICO guidance on data minimisation and storage limitation3
NEW QUESTION # 17
A privacy notice MUST NOT contain
- A. The purpose of the processing
- B. Details of the right to lodge a complaint with the supervisory authority
- C. The contact details of the controller
- D. Details of the processor's staff
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
A privacy notice is a document that provides individuals with information about how their personal data is processed, as required by Article 13 and 14 of the UK GDPR5. A privacy notice must include the following information, among others:
* the identity and contact details of the controller and, where applicable, the controller's representative and the data protection officer;
* the purposes and legal basis of the processing;
* the categories of personal data concerned;
* the recipients or categories of recipients of the personal data, including any third parties or international organisations;
* where applicable, the fact that the controller intends to transfer personal data to a third country or international organisation and the existence or absence of an adequacy decision by the Commission, or reference to the appropriate or suitable safeguards and the means by which to obtain a copy of them or where they have been made available;
* the period for which the personal data will be stored, or if that is not possible, the criteria used to determine that period;
* the existence of the rights of the data subject, such as the right to access, rectify, erase, restrict, object or port the data, and the conditions or limitations on those rights;
* the existence of the right to withdraw consent at any time, where the processing is based on consent;
* the right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority;
* whether the provision of personal data is a statutory or contractual requirement, or a requirement necessary to enter into a contract, as well as whether the data subject is obliged to provide the personal data and of the possible consequences of failure to provide such data;
* the existence of automated decision-making, including profiling, and meaningful information about the
* logic involved, as well as the significance and the envisaged consequences of such processing for the data subject.
A privacy notice does not need to contain details of the processor's staff, as this is not relevant or necessary for the data subject to understand how their personal data is processed. However, the controller may need to inform the data subject if their personal data is shared with a processor, and provide the identity and contact details of the processor, as part of the information on the recipients or categories of recipients of the personal data. References:
* Article 13 and 14 of the UK GDPR5
NEW QUESTION # 18
What factors should be considered when looking at security of processing under Article 32 of the GDPR?
Select the INCORRECT answer
- A. Adherence to an approved code of conduct
- B. Lawfulness of processing
- C. The likelihood of a risk to the rights of the data subjects
- D. The most secure option available
Answer: B
Explanation:
Explanation
Lawfulness of processing is not a factor that should be considered when looking at security of processing under Article 32 of the GDPR. Lawfulness of processing is a separate requirement that applies to all processing of personal data, regardless of the level of security. Security of processing under Article 32 of the GDPR should be based on the following factors:
* The state of the art and the costs of implementation of the security measures;
* The nature, scope, context and purposes of the processing;
* The risk of varying likelihood and severity for the rights and freedoms of natural persons;
* Adherence to an approved code of conduct or an approved certification mechanism (as an element to demonstrate compliance). References:
* Article 32 of the GDPR1
* Guidelines 07/2020 on the concepts of controller and processor in the GDPR2, p. 36
NEW QUESTION # 19
If a complainant disagrees with the decision of the UK's supervisory authority, how do they appeal this decision?
- A. To the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights)
- B. To the European Data Protection Supervisor.
- C. To the Information Commissioner
- D. To the European Commission
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
If a complainant disagrees with the decision of the UK's supervisory authority, which is the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO), they have the right to appeal to the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights).
The tribunal is an independent body that can review the ICO's decision and either uphold it, vary it or cancel it. The tribunal can also direct the ICO to take certain actions, such as issuing a decision notice or an enforcement notice. The appeal must be lodged within 28 days of receiving the ICO's decision, using the notice of appeal form and providing the relevant documents and grounds for appeal. The tribunal will then notify the ICO and the complainant of the appeal and the procedure for dealing with it. The tribunal may hold a hearing to examine the evidence and arguments of both parties, or decide the case on the basis of written submissions only. The tribunal will issue a written decision, which will be sent to both parties and published on the tribunal's website. The tribunal's decision can be further appealed tothe Upper Tribunal on a point of law, with the permission of the First Tier Tribunal or the Upper Tribunal. References:
* Information rights and data protection: appeal against the Information Commissioner1
* Notice of appeal form2
* First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights) website3
NEW QUESTION # 20
What is the basis of the accountability and data governance obligation (Article 5 (2) of the GDPR)?
- A. The controller shall appoint a DPO before carrying out large scale processing
- B. Controllers and Processors each have a responsibility to conduct legitimate interests balancing tests before processing data for direct marketing
- C. The controller shall be responsible for. and be able to demonstrate compliance with the data protection principles.
- D. Processors have overarching responsibility to ensure their processing is compliant
Answer: C
Explanation:
Explanation
Article 5(2) of the GDPR introduces the principle of accountability, which requires that the controller is responsible for, and be able to demonstrate compliance with, the data protection principles set out in Article
5(1). These principles are: lawfulness, fairness and transparency; purpose limitation; data minimisation; accuracy; storage limitation; integrity and confidentiality; and data protection by design and by default. The controller must implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure and demonstrate compliance, such as policies, procedures, records, audits, reviews, and DPIAs. The controller must also cooperate with the supervisory authority and provide any information requested by it. The other options are not the basis of the accountability and data governance obligation, although they may be related to other obligations under the GDPR. References:
* Article 5(2) of the GDPR3
* ICO guidance on accountability and governance4
NEW QUESTION # 21
Under which circumstances can the 'domestic purposes' exemption be used to justify non-compliance with the Data Protection Act 2018?
A)An individual sells make up products for commission and uses social media to promote products to friends and family B)A couple are planning their daughter's wedding and use excel to store contact details and dietary needs of the guests C)An individual employs a babysitter and stores her bank details in an encrypted document in order to make payments D)A pansh council keeps a spreadsheet to manage bookings of the village hall, it contains only contact information and time slots E)A group of students are arranging a house party and using social media to invite people that they do and do not know
- A. A. B.C. and D
- B. A,B, C, and E.
- C. B. C. D, and E
- D. B,and C
Answer: D
Explanation:
Explanation
The domestic purposes exemption applies to personal data processed by an individual only for the purposes of their personal, family or household affairs. This means that theprocessing has no connection to any professional or commercial activity. Examples of such processing include writing to friends and family, taking pictures for personal enjoyment, or keeping an address book. However, the exemption does not apply if the individual processes personal data outside the reasonable expectations of the data subject, or if the processing causes unwarranted harm to the data subject's interests. Therefore, the exemption can be used to justify non-compliance with the Data Protection Act 2018 in scenarios B and C, where the processing is purely personal and does not affect the rights and freedoms of others. However, the exemption cannot be used in scenarios A, D and E, where the processing has a professional or commercial element, or involves sharing personal data with third parties without consent or legitimate interest. References:
* Data Protection Act 2018, Schedule 2, Part 1, Paragraph 21
* ICO Guide to Data Protection, Domestic Purposes2
* ICO Guide to Data Protection, Exemptions3
NEW QUESTION # 22
Where are the definitions of "Public Authority" and "Public Bodies" found?
- A. Freedom of Information Act 2000 and Data Protection Act 2018
- B. Data Protection Act 2018 only
- C. Data Protection Act 2018 and PECR.
- D. GDPRand Data Protection Act 2018.
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
The definitions of "public authority" and "public body" for the purposes of the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 are found in the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Data Protection Act 2018 respectively. Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 2018 provides that a public authority or a public body is one that is listed in Schedule 1 to the Freedom of Information Act 2000, or is designated by an order under section
5 of that Act. However, a court or tribunal acting in its judicial capacity is not considered a public authority or a public body under the Data Protection Act 2018. References:
* Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 20181
* Schedule 1 to the Freedom of Information Act 2000
NEW QUESTION # 23
Which of the following statements MOST accurately describes the potential impact of Al on the principle of transparency?
- A. Al can lead to invisible processing, with data subjects not being aware of its presence.
- B. Data subjects should generally expect Al to be present in processing activities
- C. Transparency requirements do not apply to Al, as there is a relevant exemption
- D. Transparency requirements do not apply to Al, as it is always compatible with original purposes
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
The principle of transparency requires that any processing of personal data is fair, lawful and transparent to the data subjects. This means that data subjects should be informed about the existence, nature, purpose and consequences of the processing, as well as their rights and choices regarding their data. Transparency is essential for ensuring accountability, trust and compliance in data processing. However, the use of AI can pose challenges to the principle of transparency, as AI can lead to invisible processing, with data subjects not being aware of its presence, or the logic, significance and implications of the processing. For example, AI can be used to profile, infer, predict or influence the behaviour, preferences, interests, emotions or personality of data subjects, without their knowledge or consent. AI can also be used to make automated decisions that affect data subjects, such as credit scoring, recruitment, health diagnosis or social benefits, without providing meaningful explanations or opportunities for human intervention. Therefore, it is important to ensure that data subjects are informed and empowered when AI is involved in the processing of their data, and that they can exercise their rights, such as the right to access, rectify, object, restrict, erase or port their data, or the right to challenge or contest automated decisions56. References:
* Guidance on AI and data protection5
* Explaining decisions made with AI6
NEW QUESTION # 24
How are data sharing practices governed by data protection law?
- A. Data sharing practices are covered in the DPA 2018, supported by a statutory Code of Practice that provides specific guidance
- B. Data sharing practices are subject to the PECR until the new statutory Code of Practice is published
- C. Data sharing practices are not specifically regulated, however the ICO provide best practice guidance
- D. Data sharing practices are covered by the Freedom of Information Act
Answer: A
Explanation:
Explanation
Data sharing is the disclosure of personal data from one or more organisations to a third party organisation or organisations, or the sharing of personal data within an organisation. Data sharing practices are governed by data protection law, which includes the UK GDPR and the Data Protection Act 2018 (DPA 2018). The DPA
2018 contains specific provisions on data sharing, such as the power of the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) to issue a statutory Code of Practice on data sharing. The ICO has published a Data Sharing Code of Practice1 that provides practical guidance on how to share data in a fair, safe and transparent way, in compliance with the data protection principles and the rights of data subjects. The code is not legally binding, but it reflects the ICO's interpretation of the law and it may be used as evidence in legal proceedings or investigations. The code also contains useful tools, case studies andexamples that can help organisations to share data effectively and responsibly. References:
* Data Sharing Code of Practice1
NEW QUESTION # 25
Describe the act of processing under the authority of a controller or processor as stipulated in UK GDPR Article 29.
- A. The processor shall consult the supervisory authority prior to processing where a data protection impact assessment indicates that the processing would result in a high risk in the absence of measures taken by the processor to mitigate the risk.
- B. A processor shall not process those data except on instructions from the controller, unless required to do so by domestic law
- C. Each processor and, where applicable, the processors representative shall maintain a record of all categories of processing activities earned out on behalf of a controller.
- D. The processor shall implement appropriate technical and organisational measures for ensuring that, by default, only personal data which are necessary for each specific purpose of the processing are processed.
Answer: B
Explanation:
Explanation
Article 29 of UK GDPR states that the processor and any person acting under the authority of the controller or of the processor, who has access to personal data, shall not process those data except on instructions from the controller, unless required to do so by domestic law. This means that the processor must follow the controller's directions on how to handle the personal data, and cannot use it for its own purposes or deviate from the agreed terms. The only exception is when the processor is obliged by law to process the data in a different way, for example, to comply with a court order or a legal obligation. The other options are not related to Article 29, but to other articles of UK GDPR, such as Article 25 (data protection by design and by default), Article 30 (records of processing activities), and Article 36 (prior consultation). References:
* Article 29 of UK GDPR1
* ICO guidance on controllers and processors2
NEW QUESTION # 26
Of the following options which is NOT a purpose of carrying out a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA)?
- A. It is key to the accountability element of the GDPR.
- B. It assists in identifying the main risks that may exist in any use of data, so that they can be mitigated
- C. It fulfils a requirement that data protection is carried out by design and default.
- D. It is necessary to fulfil the requirement that all DPIAs are submitted to the ICO
Answer: D
NEW QUESTION # 27
......
PDP9 Exam Dumps PDF Guaranteed Success with Accurate & Updated Questions: https://www.prepawaypdf.com/BCS/PDP9-practice-exam-dumps.html